Current:Home > ScamsWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -Visionary Wealth Guides
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 11:08:31
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (45)
Related
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Weezer to celebrate 30th anniversary of 'Blue Album' on concert tour with The Flaming Lips
- Stock market today: Asian shares are mostly higher ahead of a US report on inflation
- A Kansas judge says barring driver’s license changes doesn’t violate trans people’s rights
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Mistrial declared in fired Penn State football team doctor’s lawsuit over 2019 ouster
- Inside Robert Downey Jr.'s Unbelievable Hollywood Comeback, From Jail to Winning an Oscar
- Luca Nardi, ranked No. 123 in the world, knocks out No. 1 Novak Djokovic at Indian Wells
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- What are superfoods? How to incorporate more into your diet
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Minnesota court affirms rejection of teaching license for ex-officer who shot Philando Castile
- CHUNG HA is ready for a new chapter: 'It's really important from now to share my stories'
- Pressure on Boeing grows as Buttigieg says the company needs to cooperate with investigations
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Kate Beckinsale shares photos from the hospital, thanks 'incredible' mom for her support
- Maryland Lawmakers Remain Uncommitted to Ending Subsidies for Trash Incineration, Prompting Advocate Concern
- Kentucky House approves bill to reduce emergency-trained workers in small coal mines
Recommendation
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Plane crash in remote central Oregon leaves ‘no survivors,’ authorities say
Lady Gaga Defends TikToker Dylan Mulvaney Against Hate Comments
Oscars got it right: '20 Days in Mariupol,' 'The Zone of Interest' wins show academy is listening
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
F1 Arcade set to open first U.S. location in Boston; Washington, D.C. to follow
Luca Nardi, ranked No. 123 in the world, knocks out No. 1 Novak Djokovic at Indian Wells
A Kansas judge says barring driver’s license changes doesn’t violate trans people’s rights